IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Neil Musselwhite Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-11-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Burlington Cougars OJHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1397 0.1484 0.3451 0.3665
2003-04 — OJHL 46 16 17 33 0.717 0.2004 0.2038 0.4951 0.5035
2004-05 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 48 25 27 52 1.083 0.3027 0.2926 0.7476 0.7225
2005-06 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 27 14 12 26 0.963 0.2691 0.2502 0.6646 0.6179
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 29 23 13 36 1.241
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 25 7 5 12 0.480
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 26 6 8 14 0.538
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 28 8 6 14 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2006-07 · SUNY Oswego
+118.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13293
Forward overall
#481
Forward born in 1985
#748
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dalton Carter
Utica · 2013-14
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Steuck
Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Drevitch
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.