IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Steuck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 10 6 5 11 1.100 0.1326 0.1465 0.3475 0.3838
2023-24 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 44 20 33 53 1.204 0.1451 0.1467 0.3805 0.3847
2024-25 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 29 18 18 36 1.241 0.1496 0.1435 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC FR 2 1 0 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Saint Mary's
+303.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28675
Forward overall
#1483
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Dawson
Nazareth · 2010-11
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Long
Fredonia · 2011-12
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Zapata
Utica · 2017-18
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.