IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Steuck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 10 6 5 11 1.100 0.1381 0.1525 0.3473 0.3836
2023-24 Minnesota Moose NA3HL 44 20 33 53 1.204 0.1512 0.1529 0.3803 0.3845
2024-25 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 29 18 18 36 1.241 0.1558 0.1494 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 2 1 0 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+287.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18538
Forward overall
#945
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Hill
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Dawson
Nazareth · 2010-11
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Braedan Moffatt
Castleton · 2013-14
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.