IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brent Hill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 39 14 22 36 0.923 0.2002 0.1998 0.7142 0.7127
2017-18 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0542 0.0513 0.1934 0.1830
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 University of New England D3 CNE JR 4 4 4 8 2.000
2019-20 University of New England D3 CNE SO 22 7 8 15 0.682
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 12 1 4 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2018-19 · Salve Regina
+339.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6712
Forward overall
#314
Forward born in 1997
#26
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bradley Golant
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Vanzant
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Gates
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.