IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Vanzant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-12-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 — OJHL 38 1 6 7 0.184 0.0451 0.0491 0.1268 0.1379
2008-09 — OJHL 45 0 17 17 0.378 0.0926 0.0960 0.2601 0.2696
2009-10 Seguin Bruins OJHL 50 3 15 18 0.360 0.0882 0.0868 0.2479 0.2439
2010-11 — OJHL 42 4 15 19 0.452 0.1109 0.1040 0.3115 0.2920
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2013-14 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 19 0 2 2 0.105
2012-13 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 18 0 4 4 0.222
2011-12 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13993
Defenseman overall
#1526
Defenseman born in 1990
#2823
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Pazzaglia
Salem State · 2004-05
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Amsley
Endicott · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Hinze
Beloit · 2024-25
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.