IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Amsley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cornwall Colts CCHL 22 3 2 5 0.227 0.0493 0.0470 0.1760 0.1677
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE SR 26 13 9 22 0.846
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE JR 26 10 5 15 0.577
2020-21 Endicott D1 — SO 3 1 2 3 1.000
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE SO 3 1 2 3 1.000
2019-20 Endicott D1 — FR 24 4 8 12 0.500
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE FR 24 4 8 12 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2019-20 · Endicott
+1143.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31881
Forward overall
#1594
Forward born in 1998
#724
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Kippenhan
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Granville
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Trousdale
St. Olaf · 2008-09
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.