IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Alexander Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-12-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 52 2 9 11 0.211 0.0459 0.0458 0.1636 0.1632
2018-19 — NAHL 15 1 2 3 0.200 0.0735 0.0714 0.2111 0.2052
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 22 2 7 9 0.409
2021-22 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 19 5 3 8 0.421
2019-20 Bowdoin D1 NESCAC FR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2019-20 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 25 2 8 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2019-20 · Bowdoin
+593.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18061
Defenseman overall
#2624
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Phee
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Houlihan
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bailey
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.