IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Johnston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-01-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 32 0 10 10 0.312 0.0939 0.0910 0.2139 0.2074
2003-04 Bowmanville Eagles OJHL 46 4 22 26 0.565 0.1698 0.1570 0.3869 0.3577
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Nichols D3 — FR 11 1 3 4 0.364
2005-06 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 8 0 0 0 0.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2005-06 · Nichols
+194.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11897
Defenseman overall
#1106
Defenseman born in 1984
#2944
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Biebel
St. Michael's College · 2014-15
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Lukenda
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Dunn
Adrian · 2013-14
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.