IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joel Wetmore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1397 0.1382 0.3451 0.3415
2010-11 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 46 12 17 29 0.630 0.1761 0.1661 0.4350 0.4102
2011-12 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 49 23 22 45 0.918 0.2566 0.2306 0.6338 0.5697
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Utica D3 UCHC SR 27 7 8 15 0.556
2014-15 Utica D3 UCHC JR 26 5 9 14 0.538
2013-14 Utica D3 UCHC SO 19 1 2 3 0.158
2012-13 Utica D3 UCHC FR 26 3 12 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2012-13 · Utica
+229.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17409
Forward overall
#683
Forward born in 1991
#1192
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Burke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Stabile
Becker · 2005-06
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Zotter
Canton · 2023-24
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.