← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Burke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-01-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Kingston Frontenacs OHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0482 0.0499 0.2140 0.2216
2001-02 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 49 44 19 63 1.286 0.3151 0.3031 0.8852 0.8514
2003-04 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 14 12 8 20 1.429 0.3501 0.3065 0.9836 0.8610
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13699
Forward overall
#462
Forward born in 1983

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2010-11
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.