← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henry McKinney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Nepean Raiders CCHL 52 5 5 10 0.192 0.0549 0.0550 0.1489 0.1493
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 11 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Skipjacks Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 38 22 38 60 1.579 0.2125 0.1942 0.5375 0.4912
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 28 10 28 38 1.357
2021-22 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 24 7 7 14 0.583
2020-21 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 10 3 3 6 0.600
2019-20 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 28 1 14 15 0.536
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2019-20 · Nazareth
+351.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36011
Forward overall
#1598
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2011-12
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.