icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | U.S. National U17 Team | NTDP-U18 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | — | NTDP-U18 | 57 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.070 | 0.0558 | 0.0540 | 0.2629 | 0.2545 |
| 2011-12 | Indiana Ice | USHL | 56 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.143 | 0.0910 | 0.0901 | 0.4282 | 0.4238 |
| 2012-13 | Indiana Ice | USHL | 58 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.224 | 0.1427 | 0.1336 | 0.6716 | 0.6290 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC | SR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2015-16 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC | JR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2014-15 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC | SO | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| 2013-14 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC | FR | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.053 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.