IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Biebel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Express Hockey Club EHL 22 3 6 9 0.409 0.0878 0.0898 0.2003 0.2049
2014-15 Express Hockey Club EHL 41 17 14 31 0.756 0.1623 0.1585 0.3703 0.3616
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Saint Michael's D2 — SO 27 6 4 10 0.370
2015-16 Saint Michael's D2 — FR 19 3 6 9 0.474
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2015-16 · Saint Michael's
+322.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31150
Forward overall
#1286
Forward born in 1994
#674
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Troy MacTavish
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Doner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Wetmore
Utica · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.