IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Troy MacTavish Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 37 3 2 5 0.135 0.0526 0.0555 0.1970 0.2079
2016-17 — CCHL 54 11 14 25 0.463 0.1321 0.1318 0.3584 0.3577
2017-18 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 58 13 26 39 0.672 0.2617 0.2503 0.9806 0.9379
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 29 2 6 8 0.276
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 10 2 2 4 0.400
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 23 2 7 9 0.391
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 26 4 10 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2018-19 · Wisconsin-Superior
+210.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23951
Forward overall
#1036
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dillon Henningson
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Ehl
New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Callanan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.