IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick DeSousa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 48 7 11 18 0.375 0.1445 0.1520 0.5457 0.5740
2009-10 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 56 26 18 44 0.786 0.3027 0.3019 1.1434 1.1403
2010-11 — BCHL 60 17 39 56 0.933 0.3596 0.3418 1.3582 1.2909
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC — 1 0 1 1 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2011-12 · Neumann
+258.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17721
Forward overall
#699
Forward born in 1990
#765
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kowin Belsterling
Chatham · 2024-25
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Billings
Salve Regina · 2015-16
1.381 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Park
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.