IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Billings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Janesville Jets NAHL 42 2 6 8 0.191 0.0707 0.0783 0.7492 0.8006
2013-14 Brockville Braves CCHL 22 6 7 13 0.591 0.1686 0.1746 0.4574 0.4738
2014-15 Brockville Braves CCHL 49 12 38 50 1.020 0.2912 0.2882 0.7899 0.7817
2015-16 Brockville Braves CCHL 59 23 32 55 0.932 0.2660 0.2504 0.7216 0.6793
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Niagara D1 AHA JR 20 7 6 13 0.650
2019-20 Niagara D1 AHA SO 34 12 15 27 0.794
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 30 19 26 45 1.500
2016-17 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 21 7 22 29 1.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.38
2016-17 · Salve Regina
+507.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14406
Forward overall
#515
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cody Pisarczyk
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Routledge
Canton · 2017-18
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zac Boyle
Neumann · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.