IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Pisarczyk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 52 14 26 40 0.769 0.2580 0.2824 0.7118 0.7792
2022-23 — AJHL 50 14 18 32 0.640 0.2147 0.2244 0.5923 0.6190
2023-24 — AJHL 29 6 6 12 0.414 0.1388 0.1385 0.3829 0.3821
2024-25 Calgary Canucks AJHL 23 9 12 21 0.913 0.3062 0.2893 0.8449 0.7983
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 26 9 3 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2025-26 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+135.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6460
Forward overall
#212
Forward born in 2004
#44
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buster Larsson
Utica · 2018-19
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Tretowicz
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brenden Kotyk
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.