IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Pisarczyk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 52 14 26 40 0.769 0.2569 0.2812 0.7140 0.7816
2022-23 — AJHL 50 14 18 32 0.640 0.2138 0.2234 0.5941 0.6209
2023-24 — AJHL 29 6 6 12 0.414 0.1382 0.1379 0.3841 0.3833
2024-25 Calgary Canucks AJHL 23 9 12 21 0.913 0.3049 0.2881 0.8475 0.8008
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 26 9 3 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2025-26 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+136.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9315
Forward overall
#385
Forward born in 2004
#278
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buster Larsson
Utica · 2018-19
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Tretowicz
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Arrigoni
Hamline · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.