IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Tretowicz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1316 0.3443 0.3694
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 53 23 17 40 0.755 0.1850 0.1902 0.5196 0.5343
2017-18 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 54 28 20 48 0.889 0.2179 0.2136 0.6120 0.5998
2018-19 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 54 26 34 60 1.111 0.2723 0.2536 0.7650 0.7123
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC GR 26 7 14 21 0.808
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 26 8 7 15 0.577
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 24 8 5 13 0.542
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 25 9 9 18 0.720
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2019-20 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+254.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17246
Forward overall
#815
Forward born in 1998
#599
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Toon De Schepper
Wilkes · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Purcell
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Olson
Hobart · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.