IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Toon De Schepper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-09-18 Country: Belgium
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 31 0 3 3 0.097 0.0121 0.0133 0.0306 0.0335
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 24 3 3 6 0.250 0.0314 0.0328 0.0789 0.0825
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 45 7 27 34 0.756 0.0948 0.0943 0.2385 0.2373
2018-19 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 45 11 69 80 1.778 0.2231 0.2102 0.5613 0.5288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC — 11 0 5 5 0.455
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4423
Defenseman overall
#1008
Defenseman born in 1998
#460
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Strawn
Endicott · 2018-19
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Whidden
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.719 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Fackey
New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.