IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rob Whidden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1980-09-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Penticton Vees BCHL 60 21 23 44 0.733 0.2825 0.2637 1.0672 0.9963
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 29 12 10 22 0.759
2003-04 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 27 14 11 25 0.926
2002-03 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 29 14 7 21 0.724
2001-02 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 32 9 14 23 0.719
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2001-02 · Wisconsin-Superior
+218.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18766
Forward overall
#401
Forward born in 1980
#867
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Campion
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Kolovos
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Mazur
Endicott · 2018-19
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.