IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Love Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-09-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Seguin Bruins OJHL 33 6 11 17 0.515 0.1439 0.1542 0.3555 0.3809
2006-07 Seguin Bruins OJHL 49 7 16 23 0.469 0.1312 0.1340 0.3239 0.3308
2007-08 — OJHL 38 10 14 24 0.632 0.1765 0.1723 0.4359 0.4255
2008-09 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 28 12 11 23 0.821 0.2295 0.2122 0.5668 0.5242
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC SR 28 4 9 13 0.464
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC JR 22 10 8 18 0.818
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC SO 15 1 3 4 0.267
2009-10 Neumann D3 — FR 20 6 7 13 0.650
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2009-10 · Neumann
+286.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21453
Forward overall
#902
Forward born in 1988
#1659
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Dillon
Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Avery
Buffalo State · 2009-10
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeffrey Beck
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.