IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Avery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 — CCHL 38 0 5 5 0.132 0.0376 0.0406 0.1019 0.1100
2008-09 — CCHL 53 23 29 52 0.981 0.2800 0.2724 0.7595 0.7388
2009-10 Cornwall Colts CCHL 56 11 31 42 0.750 0.2140 0.1983 0.5806 0.5380
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 23 4 5 9 0.391
2012-13 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 27 8 3 11 0.407
2011-12 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 19 4 7 11 0.579
2010-11 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 20 7 7 14 0.700
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2010-11 · Buffalo State
+258.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20851
Forward overall
#838
Forward born in 1989
#641
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Valenti
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Fuchs
Concordia · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Nelson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.