IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Walker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 45 9 14 23 0.511 0.0728 0.0748 0.2128 0.2185
2022-23 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 40 10 13 23 0.575 0.0819 0.0806 0.2394 0.2356
2023-24 Express Hockey Club EHL 44 26 33 59 1.341 0.1963 0.1917 0.6568 0.6413
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SO 13 4 7 11 0.846
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC — 10 1 3 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2024-25 · Albertus Magnus
+217.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17338
Forward overall
#863
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christopher Wallace
Bowdoin · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Stallard
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Altenbernd
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.