IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Stallard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 39 22 14 36 0.923 0.1981 0.1905 0.4520 0.4345
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 26 7 7 14 0.538
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 26 8 7 15 0.577
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 26 12 8 20 0.769
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 26 12 6 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2015-16 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+324.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20464
Forward overall
#817
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeffrey Gauld
Canton · 2017-18
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Valure
Concordia Wisconsin · 2018-19
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyllian Kirkwood
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.