IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camille Marcoux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 51 12 11 23 0.451 0.0768 0.0768 0.1911 0.1911
2020-21 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 5 5 0 5 1.000 0.1703 0.1703 0.4238 0.4238
2021-22 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 23 14 16 30 1.304 0.2221 0.2063 0.5528 0.5135
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE SO 22 3 3 6 0.273
2024-25 Western New England D3 CNE — 24 1 7 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Western New England
+88.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24477
Forward overall
#1240
Forward born in 2001
#190
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

C.J. Stubbs
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Melso
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Laseen
Curry · 2006-07
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.