IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Stubbs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 52 7 11 18 0.346 0.0988 0.0969 0.2680 0.2629
2014-15 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 61 10 26 36 0.590 0.1684 0.1574 0.4569 0.4271
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 15 16 31 1.240
2017-18 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 25 10 14 24 0.960
2016-17 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 25 12 16 28 1.120
2015-16 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 23 6 14 20 0.870
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2015-16 · Morrisville
+662.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29557
Forward overall
#1213
Forward born in 1994
#1037
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rider McCallum
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Higgins
Becker · 2006-07
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Polsinelli
Trinity · 2016-17
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.