← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Stubbs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 52 7 11 18 0.346 0.0751 0.0737 0.2679 0.2628
2014-15 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 61 10 26 36 0.590 0.1280 0.1197 0.4566 0.4269
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 25 15 16 31 1.240
2017-18 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 25 10 14 24 0.960
2016-17 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 25 12 16 28 1.120
2015-16 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 23 6 14 20 0.870
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2015-16 · SUNY Morrisville
+903.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35684
Forward overall
#1404
Forward born in 1994
#872
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2006-07
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.