IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rider McCallum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 13 3 4 7 0.538 0.1799 0.1799 0.4999 0.4999
2021-22 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 52 3 22 25 0.481 0.1606 0.1503 0.4463 0.4176
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 25 1 16 17 0.680
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 26 1 17 18 0.692
2023-24 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 29 4 21 25 0.862
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 27 7 17 24 0.889
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2022-23 · Plymouth State
+526.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5823
Defenseman overall
#932
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Burnett
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carmine Taffo
Trine · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Blair Falotico
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.