IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendon Manning Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 42 26 39 65 1.548 0.1775 0.1721 0.3488 0.3382
2023-24 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 46 17 23 40 0.870 0.2009 0.1965 0.4255 0.4163
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 32 8 6 14 0.438
2024-25 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 25 5 7 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2024-25 · Saint Anselm
+200.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16165
Forward overall
#802
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blair Falotico
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jaron Ketterman
Concordia · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Carmine Taffo
Trine · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.