IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonas Oesterle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 23 0 3 3 0.130 0.0147 0.0147 0.0444 0.0443
2024-25 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 39 7 30 37 0.949 0.1070 0.1005 0.3227 0.3030
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Framingham State D3 MASCAC — 25 2 9 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2025-26 · Framingham State
+676.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27875
Forward overall
#1618
Forward born in 2004
#2150
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Renaud
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Lang
Saint Anselm · 2025-26
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Vinson
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.