IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frédéric D'Amours Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-07-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0362 0.0375 0.1290 0.1337
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 43 4 16 20 0.465 0.0525 0.0523 0.1582 0.1575
2024-25 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 42 14 18 32 0.762 0.0859 0.0805 0.2592 0.2429
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6012
Defenseman overall
#1510
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kellen Wasell
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Landon Cole
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ari Lifschutz
Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.