IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kellen Wasell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 60 3 8 11 0.183 0.0726 0.0761 0.1924 0.2016
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1132 0.1129 0.3000 0.2993
2013-14 — NAHL 51 10 16 26 0.510 0.2020 0.1914 0.5352 0.5071
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SR 22 5 6 11 0.500
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — JR 18 1 2 3 0.167
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SO 19 7 8 15 0.789
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — FR 25 3 9 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2014-15 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+250.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36880
Forward overall
#1304
Forward born in 1993
#3820
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Panisa
St. Olaf · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Watson
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Guiney
Concordia (WI) · 2016-17
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.