IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Polsinelli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 26 20 46 1.210 0.3635 0.3699 0.9971 1.0146
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 27 18 15 33 1.222 0.3670 0.3556 1.0067 0.9753
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2018-19 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 26 5 7 12 0.462
2017-18 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 20 2 5 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2017-18 · Trinity
+13.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6781
Forward overall
#265
Forward born in 1996
#8
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Gibson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trever Hertz
Utica · 2009-10
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.