IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Gibson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-06-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 30 3 5 8 0.267 0.0895 0.0927 0.2468 0.2557
2009-10 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 57 17 16 33 0.579 0.1483 0.1476 0.4364 0.4344
2010-11 — SJHL 49 25 21 46 0.939 0.2405 0.2274 0.7077 0.6691
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 26 13 14 27 1.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2011-12 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+520.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27419
Forward overall
#1008
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Don Olivieri
Utica · 2011-12
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Larry Jungwirth
Aurora · 2017-18
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Lund
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.