IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dondre Watson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0838 0.0912 0.2314 0.2520
2014-15 — AJHL 32 11 8 19 0.594 0.1992 0.2063 0.5495 0.5692
2015-16 — AJHL 56 27 15 42 0.750 0.2515 0.2488 0.6941 0.6866
2016-17 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 36 17 9 26 0.722 0.1850 0.1763 0.5444 0.5189
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA — 5 0 3 3 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2017-18 · Marian
+241.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24893
Forward overall
#1006
Forward born in 1996
#695
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeffrey Beck
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Dillon
Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Avery
Buffalo State · 2009-10
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.