IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Dillon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-09-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 26 5 3 8 0.308 0.0860 0.0907 0.2123 0.2238
2003-04 Thornhill Rattlers OJHL 47 11 12 23 0.489 0.1367 0.1379 0.3377 0.3408
2004-05 Thornhill Rattlers OJHL 45 14 22 36 0.800 0.2235 0.2143 0.5521 0.5293
2005-06 Toronto Thunderbirds OJHL 44 17 31 48 1.091 0.3048 0.2810 0.7528 0.6940
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Bowdoin D3 — JR 21 1 1 2 0.095
2007-08 Bowdoin D3 — SO 17 0 3 3 0.176
2006-07 Bowdoin D3 — FR 25 7 5 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2006-07 · Bowdoin
+120.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15574
Forward overall
#569
Forward born in 1985
#976
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peyton Frantti
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Keizer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bestwick
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.