IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Dillon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-09-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 26 5 3 8 0.308 0.0754 0.0795 0.2119 0.2234
2003-04 Thornhill Rattlers OJHL 47 11 12 23 0.489 0.1200 0.1211 0.3370 0.3401
2004-05 Thornhill Rattlers OJHL 45 14 22 36 0.800 0.1961 0.1880 0.5508 0.5280
2005-06 Toronto Thunderbirds OJHL 44 17 31 48 1.091 0.2674 0.2465 0.7511 0.6924
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC JR 21 1 1 2 0.095
2007-08 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC SO 17 0 3 3 0.176
2006-07 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC FR 25 7 5 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2006-07 · Bowdoin
+151.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20456
Forward overall
#650
Forward born in 1985
#802
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Geric Brodt
Wentworth · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peyton Frantti
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxwell Reavis
UMass Boston · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.