← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peyton Frantti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 NAHL 59 14 22 36 0.610 0.2242 0.2249 0.6441 0.6462
2017-18 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 60 16 32 48 0.800 0.2939 0.2804 0.8444 0.8055
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 25 16 28 44 1.760
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D1 NCHA SO 29 15 19 34 1.172
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 15 19 34 1.172
2018-19 St. Norbert D1 NCHA FR 31 14 13 27 0.871
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 14 13 27 0.871
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2018-19 · St. Norbert
+294.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16969
Forward overall
#750
Forward born in 1997
#924
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2021-22
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.