IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peyton Frantti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — NAHL 59 14 22 36 0.610 0.2266 0.2274 0.6461 0.6482
2017-18 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 60 16 32 48 0.800 0.2970 0.2833 0.8470 0.8080
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 25 16 28 44 1.760
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 15 19 34 1.172
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 14 13 27 0.871
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2018-19 · St. Norbert
+289.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12971
Forward overall
#524
Forward born in 1997
#800
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Dicarlo
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Pickering
Concordia Wisconsin · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Albano
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.