← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Baksay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 40 9 9 18 0.450 0.0658 0.0658 0.2206 0.2206
2020-21 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 36 12 20 32 0.889 0.1300 0.1300 0.4358 0.4358
2021-22 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 26 14 22 36 1.385 0.2026 0.1985 0.6789 0.6652
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 25 6 4 10 0.400
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC 21 0 6 6 0.286
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC 23 1 2 3 0.130
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 12 1 6 7 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2022-23 · Post
+243.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11174
Forward overall
#486
Forward born in 2001
#136
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2004-05
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.