IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Kingston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-08-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 27 0 2 2 0.074 0.0437 0.0451 0.2226 0.2296
2003-04 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 43 12 19 31 0.721 0.2649 0.2624 0.7609 0.7537
2004-05 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 55 14 27 41 0.746 0.2739 0.2577 0.7869 0.7403
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Utica D3 UCHC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Utica D3 UCHC JR 25 6 17 23 0.920
2006-07 Utica D3 UCHC SO 21 5 12 17 0.809
2005-06 Utica D3 UCHC FR 27 10 14 24 0.889
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2005-06 · Utica
+300.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22814
Forward overall
#667
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Simopoulos
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Hartman
Hobart · 2021-22
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.