IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Omar Mullan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 51 9 17 26 0.510 0.1893 0.1982 0.5398 0.5651
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 55 15 27 42 0.764 0.2835 0.2826 0.8085 0.8058
2013-14 — NAHL 59 12 22 34 0.576 0.2140 0.2026 0.6102 0.5776
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 9 2 1 3 0.333
2015-16 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 24 9 9 18 0.750
2014-15 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 28 15 21 36 1.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.29
2014-15 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+540.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16637
Forward overall
#629
Forward born in 1993
#1338
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Carlson
Augsburg · 2003-04
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Antoine Bélisle
Middlebury · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Chauvin
New England College · 2018-19
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.