IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Simopoulos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 32 9 12 21 0.656 0.0858 0.0858 0.2227 0.2227
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 44 14 16 30 0.682 0.0892 0.0931 0.2314 0.2416
2022-23 Express Hockey Club EHL 23 3 9 12 0.522 0.1205 0.1234 0.2553 0.2614
2023-24 Express Hockey Club EHL 46 20 41 61 1.326 0.3063 0.2982 0.6489 0.6317
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SO 26 9 10 19 0.731
2024-25 Southern Maine D3 NEHC FR 25 5 9 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2024-25 · Southern Maine
+186.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16778
Forward overall
#833
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Deaglan Kelly
UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Egan Schmitt
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Owens
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.