← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Simopoulos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 32 9 12 21 0.656 0.0883 0.0883 0.2234 0.2234
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 44 14 16 30 0.682 0.0918 0.0958 0.2321 0.2423
2022-23 Express Hockey Club EHL 23 3 9 12 0.522 0.1120 0.1147 0.2555 0.2616
2023-24 Express Hockey Club EHL 46 20 41 61 1.326 0.2846 0.2770 0.6494 0.6321
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern Maine D3 SO 26 9 10 19 0.731
2024-25 Southern Maine D3 NEHC FR 25 5 9 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2024-25 · Southern Maine
+208.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23842
Forward overall
#1025
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.