IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Deaglan Kelly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 22 4 3 7 0.318 0.0735 0.0790 0.1557 0.1673
2023-24 Providence Capitals EHL 42 19 18 37 0.881 0.2035 0.2084 0.4311 0.4415
2024-25 Providence Capitals EHL 43 30 38 68 1.581 0.3653 0.3553 0.7738 0.7526
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10655
Forward overall
#433
Forward born in 2004
#110
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andréas Fleutot
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Obssuth
Wentworth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McKenna
Connecticut College · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.