IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan McKenna Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Mercer Chiefs NCDC 47 7 19 26 0.553 0.3085 0.3103 0.4473 0.4500
2024-25 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 46 14 30 44 0.957 0.5333 0.5128 0.7734 0.7436
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 24 6 13 19 0.792
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2025-26 · Connecticut College
+114.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7201
Forward overall
#253
Forward born in 2004
#119
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gavin Simopoulos
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kim Hilmersson
Plymouth State · 2024-25
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.