← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Obssuth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 11 20 31 0.756 0.2122 0.2154 0.6217 0.6311
2017-18 Powell River Kings BCHL 56 20 22 42 0.750 0.2890 0.2703 1.0915 1.0209
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wentworth D3 CNE 25 12 13 25 1.000
2020-21 Canisius D1 AHA JR 16 3 1 4 0.250
2019-20 Canisius D1 AHA SO 18 2 2 4 0.222
2018-19 Canisius D1 AHA FR 32 4 3 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2018-19 · Canisius
+2.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21223
Forward overall
#967
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2012-13
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.