← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Cousineau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 38 6 11 17 0.447 0.1250 0.1387 0.3088 0.3427
2006-07 Milton Menace OJHL 49 4 12 16 0.327 0.0912 0.0967 0.2253 0.2388
2007-08 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 49 17 29 46 0.939 0.2623 0.2661 0.6479 0.6574
2008-09 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 47 31 47 78 1.660 0.4637 0.4467 1.1453 1.1033
2009-10 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 49 21 44 65 1.327 0.3706 0.3375 0.9154 0.8337
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 29 7 22 29 1.000
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 28 12 26 38 1.357
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 25 11 20 31 1.240
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 22 6 11 17 0.773
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2010-11 · Adrian
+136.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6327
Forward overall
#247
Forward born in 1989
#147
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.