← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Hutton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Orangeville Crushers OJHL 44 14 16 30 0.682 0.1671 0.1880 0.4694 0.5281
2009-10 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 47 16 26 42 0.894 0.2190 0.2349 0.6152 0.6599
2011-12 OJHL 32 10 19 29 0.906 0.2221 0.2181 0.6239 0.6126
2012-13 OJHL 52 26 35 61 1.173 0.2875 0.2680 0.8077 0.7528
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Marian D1 NCHA JR 11 3 7 10 0.909
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA 11 3 7 10 0.909
2018-19 Marian D1 NCHA SO 22 2 2 4 0.182
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA 22 2 2 4 0.182
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC 15 6 7 13 0.867
2013-14 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA 15 6 7 13 0.867
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2013-14 · Concordia
+308.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15436
Forward overall
#581
Forward born in 1992
#492
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2024-25
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.