← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cayden Cahill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 36 5 10 15 0.417 0.1531 0.1608 0.4398 0.4619
2015-16 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 20 16 36 0.632 0.2320 0.2334 0.6667 0.6706
2016-17 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 49 19 24 43 0.878 0.3224 0.3068 0.9263 0.8814
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SR 10 4 6 10 1.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 10 4 6 10 1.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen JR 29 12 8 20 0.690
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 29 12 8 20 0.690
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SO 28 8 13 21 0.750
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 28 8 13 21 0.750
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 29 13 12 25 0.862
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2017-18 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+263.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18067
Forward overall
#709
Forward born in 1996
#1066
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2005-06
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.