IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cayden Cahill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 36 5 10 15 0.417 0.1547 0.1625 0.4412 0.4633
2015-16 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 20 16 36 0.632 0.2345 0.2359 0.6687 0.6726
2016-17 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 49 19 24 43 0.878 0.3259 0.3101 0.9292 0.8842
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 10 4 6 10 1.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 29 12 8 20 0.690
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 28 8 13 21 0.750
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 29 13 12 25 0.862
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2017-18 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+259.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13841
Forward overall
#542
Forward born in 1996
#921
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Boyd
St. Norbert · 2005-06
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Hall
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.