← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Boyd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-09-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 56 2 10 12 0.214 0.0716 0.0781 0.1989 0.2170
2003-04 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 57 16 18 34 0.597 0.1992 0.2061 0.5537 0.5730
2004-05 AJHL 47 12 18 30 0.638 0.2132 0.2105 0.5925 0.5849
2005-06 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 54 20 26 46 0.852 0.2845 0.2673 0.7908 0.7431
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 SR 30 9 20 29 0.967
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 JR 20 5 20 25 1.250
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 SO 32 17 22 39 1.219
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 FR 30 10 21 31 1.033
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.03
2006-07 · St. Norbert
+393.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15389
Forward overall
#564
Forward born in 1985
#688
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.