| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | Fort Saskatchewan Traders | AJHL | 56 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.214 | 0.0716 | 0.0781 | 0.1989 | 0.2170 |
| 2003-04 | Fort Saskatchewan Traders | AJHL | 57 | 16 | 18 | 34 | 0.597 | 0.1992 | 0.2061 | 0.5537 | 0.5730 |
| 2004-05 | — | AJHL | 47 | 12 | 18 | 30 | 0.638 | 0.2132 | 0.2105 | 0.5925 | 0.5849 |
| 2005-06 | Camrose Kodiaks | AJHL | 54 | 20 | 26 | 46 | 0.852 | 0.2845 | 0.2673 | 0.7908 | 0.7431 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | St. Norbert | D3 | — | SR | 30 | 9 | 20 | 29 | 0.967 |
| 2008-09 | St. Norbert | D3 | — | JR | 20 | 5 | 20 | 25 | 1.250 |
| 2007-08 | St. Norbert | D3 | — | SO | 32 | 17 | 22 | 39 | 1.219 |
| 2006-07 | St. Norbert | D3 | — | FR | 30 | 10 | 21 | 31 | 1.033 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.