← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Bancroft Hawks OJHL 13 3 4 7 0.538 0.1320 0.1332 0.3708 0.3742
2005-06 Wellington Dukes OJHL 45 30 26 56 1.244 0.3050 0.2966 0.8568 0.8331
2006-07 Wellington Dukes OJHL 49 46 31 77 1.571 0.3852 0.3553 1.0819 0.9978
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 4 0 1 1 0.250
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 12 4 4 8 0.667
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 25 6 8 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2007-08 · SUNY Oswego
+97.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10905
Forward overall
#398
Forward born in 1986
#203
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.