| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Bancroft Hawks | OJHL | 13 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.538 | 0.1505 | 0.1519 | 0.3716 | 0.3750 |
| 2005-06 | Wellington Dukes | OJHL | 45 | 30 | 26 | 56 | 1.244 | 0.3477 | 0.3381 | 0.8588 | 0.8351 |
| 2006-07 | Wellington Dukes | OJHL | 49 | 46 | 31 | 77 | 1.571 | 0.4390 | 0.4049 | 1.0844 | 1.0001 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | SR | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 |
| 2009-10 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | JR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2008-09 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | SO | 12 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.667 |
| 2007-08 | SUNY Oswego | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.560 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.