← New Search ↗ Social Card

Egan Schmitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 21 12 9 21 1.000 0.0782 0.0860 0.2258 0.2483
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 45 18 20 38 0.844 0.1812 0.1812 0.4135 0.4135
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 35 20 29 49 1.400 0.3004 0.3004 0.6856 0.6856
2021-22 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 45 16 20 36 0.800 0.2970 0.2827 0.8470 0.8061
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 8 16 24 0.889
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 16 4 2 6 0.375
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 26 10 5 15 0.577
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 25 5 6 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Babson
+152.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10352
Forward overall
#304
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.