← New Search ↗ Social Card

Egan Schmitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 21 12 9 21 1.000 0.1147 0.1261 0.2254 0.2479
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 45 18 20 38 0.844 0.1951 0.1951 0.4132 0.4132
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 35 20 29 49 1.400 0.3234 0.3234 0.6850 0.6850
2021-22 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 45 16 20 36 0.800 0.2939 0.2797 0.8444 0.8036
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 8 16 24 0.889
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 16 4 2 6 0.375
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 26 10 5 15 0.577
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 25 5 6 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Babson
+135.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8477
Forward overall
#368
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western New England · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.