← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Day Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Metro Jets NA3HL 37 5 13 18 0.486 0.0586 0.0607 0.1537 0.1593
2015-16 Metro Jets NA3HL 45 11 25 36 0.800 0.0964 0.0952 0.2527 0.2496
2016-17 Metro Jets NA3HL 47 22 38 60 1.277 0.1538 0.1441 0.4033 0.3779
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE JR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2018-19 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 22 2 2 4 0.182
2017-18 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE FR 24 6 9 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2017-18 · Johnson & Wales
+486.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34892
Forward overall
#1564
Forward born in 1996
#895
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.