← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Lovisek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 OJHL 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.0479 0.0516 0.1183 0.1273
2019-20 Navan Grads CCHL 53 8 13 21 0.396 0.1131 0.1131 0.3067 0.3067
2020-21 Navan Grads CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Navan Grads CCHL 51 25 21 46 0.902 0.2574 0.2400 0.6982 0.6511
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 25 6 9 15 0.600
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 18 3 6 9 0.500
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 28 5 8 13 0.464
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 12 2 3 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2022-23 · Adrian
+195.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25353
Forward overall
#973
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2003-04
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2005-06
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.