IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Lovisek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — OJHL 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.0420 0.0452 0.1180 0.1270
2019-20 Navan Grads CCHL 53 8 13 21 0.396 0.0859 0.0859 0.3065 0.3065
2020-21 Navan Grads CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Navan Grads CCHL 51 25 21 46 0.902 0.1956 0.1824 0.6979 0.6509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 25 6 9 15 0.600
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 18 3 6 9 0.500
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 28 5 8 13 0.464
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 12 2 3 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2022-23 · Adrian
+281.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31157
Forward overall
#1655
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Johnson
Salem State · 2003-04
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Robbins
Hobart · 2011-12
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kullan Daikawa
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.